North Olympic Peninsula Watershed Page

  • For Salmon Recovery Planning and Watershed Pages by WRIA, click here
  • For Salmon and Habitat Information Resources, click here

Return to NOPLEGroup.org Table of Contents, Site Map

DRAFT, last updated 3/15/05

East Twin and West Twin Watershed Page – WRIA 19, Tier 2

A. Watershed Information:

  1. General Watershed Description: (adapted from WRIA 19 LFA, p 22) the West Twin River and the East Twin River share similar physical characteristics, and the mouths of each stream are in close proximity to each other. The gradients are moderate to steep throughout and stream widths average between 3-9 yards (Phinney and Bucknell 1975). They are believed to produce coho and chum salmon (Phinney and Bucknell 1975) as well as winter steelhead (WDFW spawner survey database 1998). The West and East Twin Rivers have major spawning areas for coho downstream of RM 4.2 and 3.4 respectively (Phinney and Bucknell 1975), but these rivers have never produced large numbers of fall chum (Fig. B.2) (WDFW and WWTIT 1994).
  2. Hatchery impacts:
  3. Harvest impacts: More harvest information.
  4. Stakeholders: Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe is co-manager of fisheries with WDFW; Public landowners include WDNR, Washington Department of Transportation (SR 112), and Olympic National Forest. Major private landowners are Merrill and Ring, and Rayonier.
  5. Tier explanation (from NOPLE Salmon Habitat Recovery Strategy): ): Historic productivity is M+(on a scale of 1-5, these are 3 which is more than half); current productivity (based on smolt trapping data) is 2 (ML-just less than half); The Twins have a (4) for diversity of stocks: chum (depressed; critical and declining), steelhead, coho, cutthroat. East Twin is an excellent area for surf smelt in WRIA 19.

    Half of the East and West Twin watershed is in federal ownership (late successional reserve status) with major road decomissioning anticipated; the other half is in private land and could be targeted for purchase. Additionally, habitat based restoration on the watershed scale in addition to extensive monitoring being conducted in this basin makes it unique. Lower historic productivity levels within the E & W Twin basins did not warrant a lower Tier assignment, primarily due to the fact that the potential for the successful restoration of these basins is thought to be high.

  6. Bibliography:

B. Salmon Habitat Recovery Priorities:

  1. Salmonid stocks & their status. From State of Our Watersheds Report 2004, NWIFC SSHIAP, p. 132:

    SASSI Stocks (SaSI)

    ESA Status

    Origin

    Prod_Type

    1992 Stock Status

    2002 (WDFW) Stock Status*

    Pysht/Twin/Deep Creek Coho (Map)

    Not warranted

    Mixed

    Wild

    Depressed

    Healthy

    Deep Creek/East & West Twin Fall Chum (Map)

    No Data

    Native

    Wild

    Healthy

    Depressed

    Mid-Strait Coastal Cutthroat

    Not warranted

    Native

    Wild

     

    Unknown
    2000 (WDFW)


    * 2002 WDFW SaSI is incomplete and incorrect and additional information about specific stocks is available from local co-manager fisheries biologists.
    According to local fisheries biologists, all Western Strait Chum stocks deserve to be designated as depressed or even as critical under SaSI.  Chum runs must be considered critical in Clallam, Deep, the Twins, and Salt.   Coho 2002 bad year.  Trend's been down, definitely not healthy.  Of the habitats found in East Twin, West Twin and Deep Creek, East Twin is steeper, Deep is flatter and West Twin is in the middle. What that means is that Chum is relatively more important in Deep Creek, and steelhead is relatively more important in E.Twin. 
  2. Priority salmon stocks.
    • Chum because they form the basis of the food chain, they make up the most widely distributed stock, and they contribute the most in biomass and tonnage.  Stock has been degraded significantly and recovery is a high priority.
    • Coho because Coho fisheries are currently an important aspect of the local economy.
  3. Priority Limiting Watershed Process & Habitat Features. The main land use in WRIA 19 is commercial forestry and the following habitat features and/or watershed processes are responsible for the poor PVCs identified above
    • From State of Our Watersheds Report 2004, NWIFC SSHIAP:
      • Sedimentation due to high road densities, improper forest road construction and maintenance, poor forest practices, mass wasting;
      • channel instability-incision due to high sedimentation rates, lack of LWD;
      • reduced LWD-channel complexity due to riparian/floodplain roads, channelization, incision
      • poor riparian conditions, due to FP-riparian encroachment, poor forest practices
      • increased freq/mag peak flows, due to channelization, conversion from late-seral conifer to early-seral mixed forest
      • high stream temperatures, due to loss of riparian conifer cover
  4. Major actions to protect and improve: The following major actions are necessary to protect and improve the above-identified priority salmonid stocks:
    • See Recommendations from Abstract from WRIA 19 LFA (p 6)
    • See additional recommendations from bibliography under Section A above.
  5. Priority actions and areas: The following priority actions and areashave been specifically identified as priorities in resolving the priority limiting watershed processes and habitat features identified above:
  6. Community issues: The following community issues are relevant to protecting and restoring the above-identified priority salmonid stocks in this particular watershed:

C. Recovery Projects:

D. Monitoring:

E. Emerging Issues: